(IF YOU DON"T READ THIS WORD FOR WORD DON'T COMMENT!) Gun Control is defined as: efforts to REGULATE or CONTROL THE SALE of guns. No one I know is discussing the idea of BANNING all guns. There are plenty of arguments and opinions to be had on the issue and I'm on the side of folks who want to protect the 2nd amendment... But why does the idea of regulating guns throw some people into a blind rage and cause them to write long poorly articulated and poorly defended rants about how UN-American gun control is? I agree there are plenty of situations were owning a gun can be vital to ones survival and I will vouch for that without thinking twice but I doubt anyone here has any use for some of the guns that are owned like ROCKET LAUNCHERS! None of you mother (BUGGERS) are Iron Man and there is no reason you should have a (PLUCKING) rocket launcher laying around your house. Beyond that some guns can be cool for responsible collectors to own within reason, I'm down with that. But preventing untrained irresponsible crazies from owning high powered weapons legally... I fail to see how that is bad thing... And the driving the car argument, please shut up about that. We regulate drivers license's and there is plenty of red tape around owning and being able to operate a vehicle legally not to mention there are tests to say who can operate what, when and where (I'd know I took the written test twice and the road test three times. I learned the hard way you have to study and practice to pass those tests. So cocky know it all's like me going after there DL's read your road manuals!). Also the fact people refuse to look past there own convictions in order to better regulate something everyone knows good and (DANG) well not everyone should own and operate is the same reason cars are just as dangerous as guns. The situation is going to vary by the circumstances and there is never going to be a straight forward argument for something like this! There is to much to take into consideration but it's safe to say we don't need rocket launchers to defend ourselves against break ins and bears. Actually people who have the car argument in mind might be on to something, maybe if we treated guns like we do cars or other vehicles we wouldn't be having this discussion huh? What it really comes down to though... If you are selling a gun do you sell it to someone you know for a fact is going to use it to kill without reason? Do you get mad or act surprised when he/she uses it to hurt someone you love? And how do you logically or reasonably defend that decision without looking like a flaming bag of (CRABS)? You can better protect the 2nd amendment by applying some new laws and regulations, let that sink in. I have no desire to ban guns but some NEW LAWS REGULATING who can and can't OWN A CERTAIN TYPE OF GUN doesn't sound like a bad thing. I'll leave you with this in response to the argument of operating vehicles compared to regulating guns and gun laws, MOST of us drive cars and more often than not illegally but very FEW of us (and definitely hardly ever illegally) fly planes and we DO for a fact regulate who can operate what, when and were and through proper channels like TESTING, think about that. And in reference to people not obeying laws, it can't be helped that some of us are (DONKEYS) and do ignorant (SPIT) with no regards to anyone else but you don't give those people (CLUCKING) guns and if you do you don't act surprised when they use them... (AGAIN IF YOU DIDN'T READ THIS ALL WORD FOR WORD DON'T COMMENT!)
