The great cult

The greatest cult is religion... There are to many people with to many conflicting views to ever agree on one way of life or one god. But there is an obvious pattern in all religions that links them. It's the subtle differences in them, that seem a little insignificant in the grand scheme that cause the most friction. How do you know who's right, who's wrong and on what grounds can you denounce another persons religious beliefs? Then our religion depends on what we are taught, and we are taught not to question it. We are then ignorant to others beliefs and why they have those beliefs and we are unconcerned since we are taught not to question our beliefs. Cult doesn't necessarily mean bad but by definition that is exactly what I've just described. Religion is one big cult with different leaders and texts, conflicting ways and views of worship and everyone is fighting the battle to be right. People are at war with each other to prove who is right and who is wrong. They want everyone to worship the right god and live the right way. But we can't prove or disprove any god so how do we know which of the currently absent great creators is the right god with our best interest in mind? Picking the right god would be like winning the lottery and that's to say you even get a choice in the first place. I don't have religious beliefs but I have some spiritual views. You will never hear me discuss any of them in any kind of detail though. This is because we live on a planet with many other people with many other sometimes opposing views. If you're so sure your beliefs are true and they get you through life then why does it even matter if anyone else agrees? Just live your life, love, be happy and don't worry so much about the things you can't change or fix. You're here now, take advantage of this...

...

I can't understand why some people get so offended by people on the internet. You're connected to everyone at once and a majority of people are assholes and kill time by being a dick. When you open yourself up publicly these assholes can communicate with you publicly. They do one thing all day and that is look for wounded people who openly express themselves about things that are off the beaten path. Even if your into something incredibly weird, if you show interest in that something and you help build onto it you're still contributing to society. I can't say the same for the other party... Why feel bad...?

Decker

Killer Klown Colored

Killer Klown

Windows 8

 
Windows 8 should have been called Windows Touch or Windows for Touch Screens or something, then they should have held off on a Windows 8. Windows 8 is clearly designed for touch screen computers and doesn't seem practical for regular Desktop use or everyday use. I'd loose my fucking mind using it for an office job... Plus it just seems like it's pretty much an advanced version of Gallery turned into your entire desktop. I never use Gallery anyway. Besides I'm so conditioned to use a mouse and keyboard that even though I have a touch screen computer I never actually "touch" the screen anyway... The most touch screen action I get is flies landing on it and moving my page back while I'm reading or everything in my browser opening when I sneeze (this has actually happened, I'm not just trying to be funny). Plus to think someone who writes for a living is going to use a touch screen to put out screenplays or novels on a regular basis is ridiculous. I honestly would have just released some of these features as an expansion for people who use touch screen computers and would have allowed these things to be features to add on to Windows 7 and later a more reasonable version of Windows 8.

My two cents on gun laws...

 
(IF YOU DON"T READ THIS WORD FOR WORD DON'T COMMENT!) Gun Control is defined as: efforts to REGULATE or CONTROL THE SALE of guns. No one I know is discussing the idea of BANNING all guns. There are plenty of arguments and opinions to be had on the issue and I'm on the side of folks who want to protect the 2nd amendment... But why does the idea of regulating guns throw some people into a blind rage and cause them to write long poorly articulated and poorly defended rants about how UN-American gun control is? I agree there are plenty of situations were owning a gun can be vital to ones survival and I will vouch for that without thinking twice but I doubt anyone here has any use for some of the guns that are owned like ROCKET LAUNCHERS! None of you mother (BUGGERS) are Iron Man and there is no reason you should have a (PLUCKING) rocket launcher laying around your house. Beyond that some guns can be cool for responsible collectors to own within reason, I'm down with that. But preventing untrained irresponsible crazies from owning high powered weapons legally... I fail to see how that is bad thing... And the driving the car argument, please shut up about that. We regulate drivers license's and there is plenty of red tape around owning and being able to operate a vehicle legally not to mention there are tests to say who can operate what, when and where (I'd know I took the written test twice and the road test three times. I learned the hard way you have to study and practice to pass those tests. So cocky know it all's like me going after there DL's read your road manuals!). Also the fact people refuse to look past there own convictions in order to better regulate something everyone knows good and (DANG) well not everyone should own and operate is the same reason cars are just as dangerous as guns. The situation is going to vary by the circumstances and there is never going to be a straight forward argument for something like this! There is to much to take into consideration but it's safe to say we don't need rocket launchers to defend ourselves against break ins and bears. Actually people who have the car argument in mind might be on to something, maybe if we treated guns like we do cars or other vehicles we wouldn't be having this discussion huh?  What it really comes down to though... If you are selling a gun do you sell it to someone you know for a fact is going to use it to kill without reason? Do you get mad or act surprised when he/she uses it to hurt someone you love? And how do you logically or reasonably defend that decision without looking like a flaming bag of (CRABS)? You can better protect the 2nd amendment by applying some new laws and regulations, let that sink in.  I have no desire to ban guns but some NEW LAWS REGULATING who can and can't OWN A CERTAIN TYPE OF GUN doesn't sound like a bad thing. I'll leave you with this in response to the argument of operating vehicles compared to regulating guns and gun laws, MOST of us drive cars and more often than not illegally but very FEW of us (and definitely hardly ever illegally) fly planes and we DO for a fact regulate who can operate what, when and were and through proper channels like TESTING, think about that. And in reference to people not obeying laws, it can't be helped that some of us are (DONKEYS) and do ignorant (SPIT) with no regards to anyone else but you don't give those people (CLUCKING) guns and if you do you don't act surprised when they use them... (AGAIN IF YOU DIDN'T READ THIS ALL WORD FOR WORD DON'T COMMENT!)