(IF YOU DON"T READ THIS WORD FOR WORD DON'T COMMENT!) Gun Control is
defined as: efforts to REGULATE or CONTROL THE SALE of guns. No one I
know is discussing the idea of BANNING all guns. There are plenty of
arguments and opinions to be had on the issue and I'm on the side of
folks who want to protect the 2nd amendment... But why does the idea of
regulating guns throw some people into a blind rage and cause them to
write long poorly articulated and poorly defended rants about how
UN-American gun control is? I agree there are plenty of situations were
owning a gun can be vital to ones survival and I will vouch for that
without thinking twice but I doubt anyone here has any use for some of
the guns that are owned like ROCKET LAUNCHERS! None of you mother (BUGGERS) are Iron Man and there is no reason you should have a (PLUCKING)
rocket launcher laying around your house. Beyond that some guns can be
cool for responsible collectors to own within reason, I'm down with
that. But preventing untrained irresponsible crazies from owning high
powered weapons legally... I fail to see how that is bad thing... And
the driving the car argument, please shut up about that. We regulate
drivers license's and there is plenty of red tape around owning and
being able to operate a vehicle legally not to mention there are tests
to say who can operate what, when and where (I'd know I took the written
test twice and the road test three times. I learned the hard way you
have to
study
and practice to pass those tests. So cocky know it all's like me going
after there DL's read your road manuals!). Also the fact people refuse
to look past there own convictions in order to better regulate something
everyone knows good and (DANG) well not everyone should own and operate
is the same reason cars are just as dangerous as guns. The situation is
going to vary by the circumstances and there is never going to be a
straight forward argument for something like this! There is to much to
take into consideration but it's safe to say we don't need rocket
launchers to defend ourselves against break ins and bears. Actually
people who have the car argument in mind might be on to something, maybe
if we treated guns like we do cars or other vehicles we wouldn't be
having this discussion huh? What it really comes down to though... If
you are selling a gun do you sell it to someone you know for a fact is
going to use it to kill without reason? Do you get mad or act surprised
when he/she uses it to hurt someone you love? And how do you logically
or reasonably defend that decision without looking like a flaming bag of (CRABS)? You can better protect the 2nd amendment by applying some new
laws and regulations, let that sink in. I have no desire to ban guns
but some NEW LAWS REGULATING who can and can't OWN A CERTAIN TYPE OF GUN
doesn't sound like a bad thing. I'll leave you with this in response to
the argument of operating vehicles compared to regulating guns and gun
laws, MOST of us drive cars and more often than not illegally but very
FEW of us (and definitely hardly ever illegally) fly planes and we DO
for a fact regulate who can operate what, when and were and through
proper channels like TESTING, think about that. And in reference to
people not obeying laws, it can't be helped that some of us are (DONKEYS)
and do ignorant (SPIT) with no regards to anyone else but you don't give
those people (CLUCKING) guns and if you do you don't act surprised when
they use them... (AGAIN IF YOU DIDN'T READ THIS ALL WORD FOR WORD DON'T
COMMENT!)